欢迎来到培顿国际教育
培顿教育电话
当前位置:首页>托福>托福写作

托福考试综合写作范文赏析

发布时间:2021-09-19 15:28:33浏览次数:3文章来源:培顿教育
导读:  托福考试综合写作范文赏析 本次考试托福写作:综合点评8月22日的综合写作部分难度中等, 本场的独立写作题目与以下时间的考试

  托福考试综合写作范文赏析  本次考试托福写作:综合点评822综合写作部分难度中等, 本场的独立写作题目与以下时间的考试重复: 2021.03.27/ 2019.07.07/ 2017.05.13 (三选一题型) :

  综合写作

  话题分类生物类

  考题回忆总论点是否政府应该拨款资助术家和艺术作品

托福考试综合写作范文赏析

  阅读部分1.政府资助艺术不在法律范围内,公民的娱乐已经超出了政府的管辖范围,而且有很多其他的东西需要政府的支持

  2. 政府资助会增加艺术作品的审查,有些会造成不利影响,比如压抑和政治意见相左的艺术创作

  3. 艺术作品不需要投入资金,因为很多文化产业公司已经很有钱,不需要政府拨款

  听力部分1.以美国拨款两亿修建国家公园为例,证明资助娱乐活动的重要性

  2.审查工作是由NEA专门审查,且只针对艺术家本身,和政治无关

  3. 好莱坞的成功是个例,其他的项目比如儿童艺术需要政府支持

  解题思路传统四段式写作,每一段阅读内容中心句+听力中心句+听力的支持细节。

  参考范文The writer and the speaker have a debate on whether the government should fund artists and works of art. The writer points out that they should not deserve the aid, but according to the lecture, it is important for the government to spend money on them.

  First, the writer claims that government funding for art is not within the scope of the law.. However, the lecture points out that Supporting entertainment is the obligation of the state. Just as the government spends money on the construction of parks, it is what the people need.

  Second, the passage states that government funding will increase the censorship of works of art, and some will have adverse effects, such as suppressing artistic creation with conflicting political opinions. Nevertheless, the speaker claims that the review work is specially reviewed by NEA and is only aimed at the artists themselves, which has nothing to do with politics.

  Last, although works of art do not need investment, because many cultural industries are already very rich and do not need government funding, the speaker casts doubt on this opinion by saying that Hollywood's success is an example. Other projects, such as children's art, need government support.

  更多托福备考干货,请关注培顿 教育,托福培训课程正在免费试听,在线咨询预约哦

 

猜你喜欢

相关课程
免费课程
托福 雅思 SAT 预备课 学术课 美高学分 学业规划